lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:44:07 +0900 (KST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: loke.chetan@...il.com Cc: bjorn.topel@...il.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...com, brouer@...hat.com, michael.lundkvist@...csson.com, ravineet.singh@...csson.com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.topel@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anjali.singhai@...el.com, rami.rosen@...el.com, jeffrey.b.shaw@...el.com, ferruh.yigit@...el.com, qi.z.zhang@...el.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] packet: introduce AF_PACKET V4 userspace API From: chet l <loke.chetan@...il.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:34:32 -0800 > I have not reviewed the entire patchset but I think if we could add a > version_hdr and then unionize the fields, it might be easier to add > SVM support without having to spin v5. I could be wrong though. Please, NO VERSION FIELDS! Design things properly from the start rather than using a crutch of being able to "adjust things later".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists