lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:44:18 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Cc:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel stack corruption during/after Netlabel error

On 11/30/17 3:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> @@ -1631,24 +1659,6 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  	th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
>  	iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> -	/* This is tricky : We move IPCB at its correct location into TCP_SKB_CB()
> -	 * barrier() makes sure compiler wont play fool^Waliasing games.
> -	 */
> -	memmove(&TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h4, IPCB(skb),
> -		sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
> -	barrier();
> -
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = ntohl(th->seq);
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq = (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + th->syn + th->fin +
> -				    skb->len - th->doff * 4);
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq = ntohl(th->ack_seq);
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags = tcp_flag_byte(th);
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_tw_isn = 0;
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield = ipv4_get_dsfield(iph);
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked	 = 0;
> -	TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp =
> -			skb->tstamp || skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp;
> -
>  lookup:
>  	sk = __inet_lookup_skb(&tcp_hashinfo, skb, __tcp_hdrlen(th), th->source,
>  			       th->dest, sdif, &refcounted);

I believe moving the above is going to affect lookups with VRF. Let me
take a look before this gets committed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ