netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:24:49 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace.

On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 19:29 +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> hi all. we can add synchronize_rcu and rcu_barrier in
> sock_inuse_exit_net to
> ensure there are no outstanding rcu callbacks using this network
> namespace.
> we will not have to test if net->core.sock_inuse is NULL or not from
> sock_inuse_add(). :)
> 
>  static void __net_exit sock_inuse_exit_net(struct net *net)
>  {
>         free_percpu(net->core.prot_inuse);
> +
> +       synchronize_rcu();
> +       rcu_barrier();
> +
> +       free_percpu(net->core.sock_inuse);
>  }


Oh well. Do you have any idea of the major problem this would add ?

Try the following, before and after your patches :

for i in `seq 1 40`
do
 (for j in `seq 1 100` ; do unshare -n /bin/true >/dev/null ; done) & 
done
wait

( Check commit 8ca712c373a462cfa1b62272870b6c2c74aa83f9 )


This is a complex problem, we wont accept patches that kill network
namespaces dismantling performance by adding brute force
synchronize_rcu() or rcu_barrier() calls.

Why not freeing net->core.sock_inuse right before feeing net itself in
net_free() ?

You do not have to hijack sock_inuse_exit_net() just because it has a
misleading name.