netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] veth: set peer GSO values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 9 Dec 2017 09:41:25 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] veth: set peer GSO values

On 12/7/17 4:40 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index f5438d0978ca..a69ad39ee57e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static int veth_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (ifmp && (dev->ifindex != 0))
>  		peer->ifindex = ifmp->ifi_index;
>  
> +	peer->gso_max_size = dev->gso_max_size;
> +	peer->gso_max_segs = dev->gso_max_segs;
> +
>  	err = register_netdevice(peer);
>  	put_net(net);
>  	net = NULL;
> 

What if gso changes are made after device create? They are not
propagated to the peer device like they are on link create.