[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:33:03 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
Cc: selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, nhorman@...driver.com,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sctp: Add ip option support
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 07:31:21PM +0000, Richard Haines wrote:
> ...
>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -3123,8 +3123,10 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_maxseg(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, unsigned
>>
>> if (asoc) {
>> if (val == 0) {
>> + struct sctp_af *af = sp->pf->af;
>> val = asoc->pathmtu;
>> - val -= sp->pf->af->net_header_len;
>> + val -= af->ip_options_len(asoc->base.sk);
>> + val -= af->net_header_len;
>> val -= sizeof(struct sctphdr) +
>> sizeof(struct sctp_data_chunk);
>> }
>
> Right below here there is a call to sctp_frag_point(). That function
> also needs this tweak.
>
> Yes, we should simplify all these calculations. I have a patch to use
> sctp_frag_point on where it is currently recalculating it on
> sctp_datamsg_from_user(), but probably should include other places as
> well.
FYI: Richard let me know he is occupied with another project at the
moment and likely won't be able to do another respin until next week
at the earliest.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists