netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: tap: fix POLLOUT condition in tap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:03:21 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     cugyly@....com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: tap: fix POLLOUT condition in tap_poll()

From: yuan linyu <cugyly@....com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:22:16 +0800

> From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
> 
> from logical view, if sock_writeable(&q->sk) return false,
> original second condition will return false too,
> change it and make second condition can return true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
 ...
> @@ -587,8 +587,7 @@ static unsigned int tap_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>  		mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
>  
>  	if (sock_writeable(&q->sk) ||
> -	    (!test_and_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &q->sock.flags) &&
> -	     sock_writeable(&q->sk)))
> +	    !test_and_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &q->sock.flags))
>  		mask |= POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.7.4

Hmmm, this same exact test also exists in tun_chr_poll().

The second condition probably never trigger, because of the reasons
you have listed.  The only side effect is that it will set the
ASYNC_NOSPACE bit in the socket flags.

Logically, it seems we can remove the second condition altogether.

But I wonder what might break if we stop trying to set that socket
flags bit in this situation.

Overall, I'm not sure this change is safe at all.