lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:11:08 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>
Cc:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with
 virtio - bisected

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Hartmann
<andihartmann@...19freenet.de> wrote:
> On 12/20/2017 at 11:44 PM Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Andreas Hartmann
>> <andihartmann@...19freenet.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2017 at 06:11 PM Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2017 at 11:33 PM Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been able to reproduce the hang by sending a UFO packet
>>>>> between two guests running v4.13 on a host running v4.15-rc1.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vhost_net_ubuf_ref refcount indeed hits overflow (-1) from
>>>>> vhost_zerocopy_callback being called for each segment of a
>>>>> segmented UFO skb. This refcount is decremented then on each
>>>>> segment, but incremented only once for the entire UFO skb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before v4.14, these packets would be converted in skb_segment to
>>>>> regular copy packets with skb_orphan_frags and the callback function
>>>>> called once at this point. v4.14 added support for reference counted
>>>>> zerocopy skb that can pass through skb_orphan_frags unmodified and
>>>>> have their zerocopy state safely cloned with skb_zerocopy_clone.
>>>>>
>>>>> The call to skb_zerocopy_clone must come after skb_orphan_frags
>>>>> to limit cloning of this state to those skbs that can do so safely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try a host with the following patch. This fixes it for me. I
>>>>> intend to
>>>>> send it to net.
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> index a592ca025fc4..d2d985418819 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> @@ -3654,8 +3654,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff
>>>>> *head_skb,
>>>>>
>>>>>                  skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |=
>>>>> skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
>>>>>                                                SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
>>>>> -               if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>> -                       goto err;
>>>>>
>>>>>                  while (pos < offset + len) {
>>>>>                          if (i >= nfrags) {
>>>>> @@ -3681,6 +3679,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff
>>>>> *head_skb,
>>>>>
>>>>>                          if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb,
>>>>> GFP_ATOMIC)))
>>>>>                                  goto err;
>>>>> +                       if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
>>>>> GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>> +                               goto err;
>>>>>
>>>>>                          *nskb_frag = *frag;
>>>>>                          __skb_frag_ref(nskb_frag);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is relatively inefficient, as it calls skb_zerocopy_clone for each
>>>>> frag
>>>>> in the frags[] array. I will follow-up with a patch to net-next that
>>>>> only
>>>>> checks once per skb:
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> index 466581cf4cdc..a293a33604ec 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> @@ -3662,7 +3662,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff
>>>>> *head_skb,
>>>>>
>>>>>                  skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |=
>>>>> skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
>>>>>                                                SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
>>>>> -               if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>> +               if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
>>>>> +                   skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>>                          goto err;
>>>>>
>>>>>                  while (pos < offset + len) {
>>>>> @@ -3676,6 +3677,11 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff
>>>>> *head_skb,
>>>>>
>>>>>                                  BUG_ON(!nfrags);
>>>>>
>>>>> +                               if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb,
>>>>> GFP_ATOMIC) ||
>>>>> +                                   skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
>>>>> +                                                      GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>> +                                       goto err;
>>>>> +
>>>>>                                  list_skb = list_skb->next;
>>>>>                          }
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -3687,9 +3693,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff
>>>>> *head_skb,
>>>>>                                  goto err;
>>>>>                          }
>>>>>
>>>>> -                       if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb,
>>>>> GFP_ATOMIC)))
>>>>> -                               goto err;
>>>>> -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently testing this one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Test is in progress. I'm testing w/ 4.14.7, which already contains "net:
>>> accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet".
>>>
>>> At first, I tested an unpatched 4.14.7 - the problem (no more killable
>>> qemu-process) did occur promptly on shutdown of the machine. This was
>>> expected.
>>>
>>> Next, I applied the above patch (the second one). Until now, I didn't
>>> face any problem any more on shutdown of VMs. Looks promising.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
>> I sent the first, simpler, one to net together with another fix.
>>
>>    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/851715/
>>
>
> If I'm using the second patch above (the more efficient one and not
> "[net,1/2] skbuff: orphan frags before zerocopy clone"), which I'm already
> testing here: Is it still necessary to apply this patch "[net,2/2] skbuff:
> skb_copy_ubufs must release uarg even without user frags"?

Not for this issue. It is an unrelated bug and not triggered by virtio_net
as configured normally.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ