lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:26:06 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     nhorman@...hat.com
Cc:     nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        tedheadster@...il.com, klassert@...hematik.tu-chemnitz.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] 3c59x: fix missing dma_mapping_error check and bad
 ring refill logic

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:13:33 -0500

> Thats exactly what this patch does, instead of creating a second loop to
> traverse all the emptied ring buffers, now I:
> 
> 1) Pre-allocate a new skb when I know I'm going to receive the in-place skb
> 2) Map the skb into the appropriate dma device domain
> 3) If (1) and (2) succede, then I swap the newly allocate skb and dma address
> with the old one and recieve the old into the network stack
> 4) If (1) or (2) fail, then I goto clear_complete, which leaves the old skb and
> dma address in place, sets the buffer status back to 0 (indicating completion),
> and write the new ring status back to the hardware
> 
> This is what you wanted, a pre-allocate and swap-if-successful, recycle-if-not
> approach, rather than the leave-a-hole-in-the-ring approach that is there
> currently, no?  Or did I miss something else?

I misread the code sorry, you're absolutely right.

I'll apply this patch, thanks Neil. :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ