lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:45:21 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:     jiri@...nulli.us, kubakici@...pl, dsahern@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 00/10] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share
 filter block instances

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 07:41:54 -0500

> I agree with Jiri - if you consciously choose to share there should
> be no suprises with what filters get applied.

Wrong.  It is not always the case that the two entities making changes
are coordinated explicitly.

Block operations shared across devices must therefore be _explicit_.

Any other behavior will result in surprised and unintended
consequences.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ