lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 07 Jan 2018 21:30:17 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     idosch@...lanox.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
        weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] ipv6: Align nexthop behaviour with IPv4

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Date: Sun,  7 Jan 2018 12:45:00 +0200

> This set tries to eliminate some differences between IPv4's and IPv6's
> treatment of nexthops. These differences are most likely a side effect
> of IPv6's data structures (specifically 'rt6_info') that incorporate
> both the route and the nexthop and the late addition of ECMP support in
> commit 51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath
> (ECMP)").
 ...
> Finally, this series also serves as a good first step towards David
> Ahern's goal of treating nexthops as standalone objects [2], as it makes
> the code more in line with IPv4 where the nexthop and the nexthop group
> are separate objects from the route itself.
 ...

Looks great, series applied, thanks Ido!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ