netdev - Re: dvb usb issues since kernel 4.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:26:04 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Josef Griebichler <griebichler.josef@....at>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: dvb usb issues since kernel 4.9

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:42:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:
> Em Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:51:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> escreveu:
> 
[...]
> Patch makes sense to me, although I was not able to test it myself.

The patch also make sense to me.  I've done some basic testing with it
on my high-end Broadwell system (that I use for 100Gbit/s testing). As
expected the network overload case still works, as NET_RX_SOFTIRQ is
not matched. 

> I set a RPi3 machine here with vanilla Kernel 4.14.11 running a
> standard raspbian distribution (with elevator=deadline).

I found a Raspberry Pi Model B+ (I think, BCM2835), that I loaded the
LibreELEC distro on.  One of the guys even created an image for me with
a specific kernel[1] (that I just upgraded the system with).

[1] https://forum.libreelec.tv/thread/4235-dvb-issue-since-le-switched-to-kernel-4-9-x/?postID=77031#post77031

> My plan is to do more tests along this week, and try to tweak a little
> bit both userspace and kernelspace, in order to see if I can get
> better results.

I've previously experienced that you can be affected by the scheduler
granularity, which is adjustable (with CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y):

 $ grep -H . /proc/sys/kernel/sched_*_granularity_ns
 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns:2250000
 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns:3000000

The above numbers were confirmed on the RPi2 (see[2]). With commit
4cd13c21b207 ("softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job"), I expect/assume that
softirq processing latency is bounded by the sched_wakeup_granularity_ns,
which with 3 ms is not good enough for their use-case.

Thus, if you manage to reproduce the case, try to see if adjusting this
can mitigate the issue...

Their system have non-preempt kernel, should they use PREEMPT?

 LibreELEC:~ # uname -a
 Linux LibreELEC 4.14.10 #1 SMP Tue Jan 9 17:35:03 GMT 2018 armv7l GNU/Linux

[2] https://forum.libreelec.tv/thread/4235-dvb-issue-since-le-switched-to-kernel-4-9-x/?postID=76999#post76999
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer