netdev - Re: [Patch net] 8021q: fix a memory leak for VLAN 0 device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 01:13:13 +0200
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] 8021q: fix a memory leak for VLAN 0 device

On 01/10/2018 01:06 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
> <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> On 01/10/2018 12:47 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
>>> <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
[snip]>> I'm not arguing about this patch now, I've said what I had to say back then,
>> I just gave it as a reference in case there's still relevant information in
>> there.
> 
> Me neither, I just want to point it out memory leak is real
> and not even related to bond.
> 

haha I know, all of my examples in there didn't have bond involved at all.
Again - IMO the patch is correct!