lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:27:58 +0100 From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> To: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II support On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:34:14 -0800, William Tu wrote: > I'd also prefer reverting ceaa001a170e since it's more clean but I > also hope to have this feature in 4.15. > How long does reverting take? Am I only able to submit the new patch > after the reverting is merged? Or I can submit revert and this new > patch in one series? I have little experience in reverting, can you > suggest which way is better? Send the revert for net (subject will be "[PATCH net] revert: openvswitch: Add erspan tunnel support."). Don't forget to explain why you're proposing a revert. After it is accepted and applied to net.git, wait until the patch appears in net-next.git. It may take a little while. After that, send the new patch(es) for net-next. Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists