netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix divides by zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:42:32 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix divides by zero

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:33:26PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible.
> 
> Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands,
> but this seems a minor detail.
> 
> Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/core.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index
> 51ec2dda7f08c6c90af084589bb6d80662c77d12..7949e8b8f94e9cc196e0449214493
> ccce61b0903 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs,
> const struct bpf_insn *insn,
>  		DST = tmp;
>  		CONT;
>  	ALU_MOD_X:
> -		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
> +		if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))

wow.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
we likely need to fix all JITs as well.
At least x64, arm64, sparc have the same bug.

Long term it's probably better to move all such checks out of JITs
and interpreter into the verifier and patch div/mod with
additional 'if src == 0'. This way we can do any type of
error reporting and/or aborting execution.