lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:26:23 +0300
From:   Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     hkallweit1@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in 39461af74125 "bitmap: replace
 bitmap_{from,to}_u32array"

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100
> 
> > Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and
> > advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit:
> > The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in
> > store_link_ksettings_for_user() should be __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS
> > instead of __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32.
> > 
> > After having changed this ethtool behaves normally again.
> 
> I do not see the commit with the SHA1 ID from the Subject line in
> either Linus's nor my networking tree.
> 
> Where is that change?

It's in next-20180202.

Yury

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ