netdev - Re: net: phy: question about phy_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:51:44 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: phy: question about phy_is_internal for generic-phy

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 07:09:25PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Is there a way to specify "phy is internal" to generic phy driver,
> that is, to make phy_is_internal() function available?
> 
> I found "phy-is-integrated" DT property in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/phy.txt, however, it seems
> that the property is no effect for generic phy. And I think that
> the meaning of "integrated" is slightly different from "internal".

Hi Kunihiko

Could you explain the bigger picture. Why do you need this?

Thanks
	Andrew