netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath9k: turn on btcoex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:15:53 +0800
From:   Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To:     Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: turn on btcoex_enable as default



> On 10 Feb 2018, at 10:05 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> wrote:
> 
> On 2018-02-10 14:56, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
>> 
>>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 3:16 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Sure, but we have to make sure that we don't create regressions on
>>> existing systems. For example, did you test this with any system which
>>> don't support btcoex? (just asking, haven't tested this myself)
>> 
>> No not really, but I will definitely test it.
>> The only module I have that uses ath9k is Dell’s DW1707.
>> How do I check if it support btcoex or not?
> I just reviewed the code again, and I am sure that we cannot merge this
> patch. Enabling the btcoex parameter makes the driver enable a whole
> bunch of code starting timers, listening to some GPIOs, etc.
> 
> On non-btcoex systems, some of those GPIOs might be floating or even
> connected to different things, which could cause a lot of undefined
> behavior.
> 
> This is simply too big a risk, so there absolutely needs to be a
> whitelist for systems that need this, otherwise it has to remain
> disabled by default.

So what information can we use to whitelist btcoex chips?
Can we get btcoex support status at ath9k probing?

Kai-Heng

> 
> - Felix