| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:18:39 +0200
From: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: ilyal@...lanox.com, borisp@...lanox.com, tracywwnj@...il.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, weiwan@...gle.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
davejwatson@...com
Subject: [PATCH v4 net] tls: Use correct sk->sk_prot for IPV6
The tls ulp overrides sk->prot with a new tls specific proto structs.
The tls specific structs were previously based on the ipv4 specific
tcp_prot sturct.
As a result, attaching the tls ulp to an ipv6 tcp socket replaced
some ipv6 callback with the ipv4 equivalents.
This patch adds ipv6 tls proto structs and uses them when
attached to ipv6 sockets.
Fixes: 3c4d7559159b ('tls: kernel TLS support')
Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>
---
net/tls/tls_main.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index e9b4b53..d824d54 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -46,16 +46,26 @@
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
enum {
+ TLSV4,
+ TLSV6,
+ TLS_NUM_PROTS,
+};
+
+enum {
TLS_BASE_TX,
TLS_SW_TX,
TLS_NUM_CONFIG,
};
-static struct proto tls_prots[TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
+static struct proto *saved_tcpv6_prot;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(tcpv6_prot_mutex);
+static struct proto tls_prots[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
static inline void update_sk_prot(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
{
- sk->sk_prot = &tls_prots[ctx->tx_conf];
+ int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
+
+ sk->sk_prot = &tls_prots[ip_ver][ctx->tx_conf];
}
int wait_on_pending_writer(struct sock *sk, long *timeo)
@@ -453,8 +463,21 @@ static int tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
return do_tls_setsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
}
+static void build_protos(struct proto *prot, struct proto *base)
+{
+ prot[TLS_BASE_TX] = *base;
+ prot[TLS_BASE_TX].setsockopt = tls_setsockopt;
+ prot[TLS_BASE_TX].getsockopt = tls_getsockopt;
+ prot[TLS_BASE_TX].close = tls_sk_proto_close;
+
+ prot[TLS_SW_TX] = prot[TLS_BASE_TX];
+ prot[TLS_SW_TX].sendmsg = tls_sw_sendmsg;
+ prot[TLS_SW_TX].sendpage = tls_sw_sendpage;
+}
+
static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
{
+ int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
struct tls_context *ctx;
int rc = 0;
@@ -479,6 +502,17 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
ctx->getsockopt = sk->sk_prot->getsockopt;
ctx->sk_proto_close = sk->sk_prot->close;
+ /* Build IPv6 TLS whenever the address of tcpv6_prot changes */
+ if (ip_ver == TLSV6 &&
+ unlikely(sk->sk_prot != smp_load_acquire(&saved_tcpv6_prot))) {
+ mutex_lock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
+ if (likely(sk->sk_prot != saved_tcpv6_prot)) {
+ build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV6], sk->sk_prot);
+ smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv6_prot, sk->sk_prot);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
+ }
+
ctx->tx_conf = TLS_BASE_TX;
update_sk_prot(sk, ctx);
out:
@@ -493,21 +527,9 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
.init = tls_init,
};
-static void build_protos(struct proto *prot, struct proto *base)
-{
- prot[TLS_BASE_TX] = *base;
- prot[TLS_BASE_TX].setsockopt = tls_setsockopt;
- prot[TLS_BASE_TX].getsockopt = tls_getsockopt;
- prot[TLS_BASE_TX].close = tls_sk_proto_close;
-
- prot[TLS_SW_TX] = prot[TLS_BASE_TX];
- prot[TLS_SW_TX].sendmsg = tls_sw_sendmsg;
- prot[TLS_SW_TX].sendpage = tls_sw_sendpage;
-}
-
static int __init tls_register(void)
{
- build_protos(tls_prots, &tcp_prot);
+ build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV4], &tcp_prot);
tcp_register_ulp(&tcp_tls_ulp_ops);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists