netdev - Re: [PATCH] DT: net: renesas,ravb: document R8A77980 bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:28:25 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Cc:     sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT: net: renesas,ravb: document R8A77980 bindings

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:10:51PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:58:24 +0100
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:53:17PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> >> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300
> >> 
> >> > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB
> >> >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> >> >> 
> >> >> ---
> >> >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's
> >> >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-)
> >> > 
> >> >    David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because
> >> > it was posted during the merge window?
> >> 
> >> No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere
> >> DT update.
> > 
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > I am happy to take these kinds of changes for the ravb and sh_eth drivers
> > if that is your preference. I am also just as happy for you to take them,
> > which I think has been the case for similar changes in the past.
> 
> No, it's not a problem.  Applied to 'net', thanks.

Great, thanks.