netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] team: Use extack to report enslavement failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:28:34 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:     kubakici@...pl, idosch@...sch.org, jbenc@...hat.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        dsahern@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: Use extack to report enslavement
 failures

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:12:41 +0100

> Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:59AM CET, kubakici@...pl wrote:
>>On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:22:12 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> > If so, for how long? They should certainly be removed eventually. How
>>> > do we ensure we don't forget?
>>> > 
>>> > Seems to me it would be better to remove them right now.  
>>> 
>>> I can do that unless someone objects.
>>
>>I don't object, but FWIW keep in mind extack errors don't show if
>>libmnl is not installed..
> 
> Yeah, or if you have an older iproute2 package. I would keep the existing
> dmesg msgs for now. In the future, when everyone is used to exacks, then
> we can remove them.

That's how I feel about this as well.