lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:22:54 -0700
From:   Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>,
        Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] net: avoid a kernel panic during sk_busy_loop

Hi Dave,

I stumbled across a reproducible kernel panic while playing around with
busy_poll on a Linux 4.9.86 kernel. There's an unfortunate interaction
between init_dummy_netdev, which doesn't bother to fill in netdev_ops, and
sk_busy_loop, which assumes netdev_ops is a valid pointer.

To reproduce on the device under test (DUT), I did:

  $ ip addr show dev wlan0
  8: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq [...]
      inet 172.16.122.6/23 brd 172.16.123.255 scope global wlan0
  $ sysctl -w net.core.busy_read=50
  $ nc -l 172.16.122.6 5001

Then transmitted some data to this socket from a second host:

  $ echo "foo" | nc 172.16.122.6 5001

The DUT immediately hits a kernel panic.

I've attached a patch that applies cleanly to the 4.9.87 stable release.
This fix isn't necessary for net/net-next (ndo_busy_poll was removed in
linux-4.11), but a further backport of this commit is likely required for
any stable releases older than linux-4.5.

I hope this is the right way to raise something like this. I couldn't find
a clear answer from the -stable and netdev howtos for bugs against features
that no longer exist in mainline.

Thanks,
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ