netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Fix operstate for virtio when no VIRTIO_NET_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:07:16 +0200
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Fix operstate for virtio when no
 VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:42:41PM +0000, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	The operstate update logic will leave an interface in the
> default UNKNOWN operstate if the interface carrier state never changes
> from the default carrier up state set at creation.  This includes the
> case of an explicit call to netif_carrier_on, as the carrier on to on
> transition has no effect on operstate.
> 
> 	This affects virtio-net for the case that the virtio peer does
> not support VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS (the feature that provides carrier state
> updates).  Without this feature, the virtio specification states that
> "the link should be assumed active," so, logically, the operstate should
> be UP instead of UNKNOWN.  This has impact on user space applications
> that use the operstate to make availability decisions for the interface.
> 
> 	Resolve this by changing the virtio probe logic slightly to call
> netif_carrier_off for both the "with" and "without" VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS
> cases, and then the existing call to netif_carrier_on for the "without"
> case will cause an operstate transition.
> 
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>

Arguably userspace apps should learn to treat UNKNOWN as UP.
But on the balance this seems more likely to fix apps than to
break any, so

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>


> ---
> 
> 	I considered resolving this by changing linkwatch_init_dev to
> unconditionally call rfc2863_policy, as that would always set operstate
> for all interfaces.
> 
> 	This would not have any impact on most cases (as most drivers
> call netif_carrier_off during probe), except for the loopback device,
> which currently has an operstate of UNKNOWN (because it never does any
> carrier state transitions).  This change would add a round trip on the
> dev_base_lock for every loopback device creation, which could have a
> negative impact when creating many loopback devices, e.g., when
> concurrently creating large numbers of containers.
> 
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 23374603e4d9..7b187ec7411e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2857,8 +2857,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	/* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
>  	   otherwise get link status from config. */
> +	netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  	if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> -		netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  		schedule_work(&vi->config_work);
>  	} else {
>  		vi->status = VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> -- 
> 2.14.1