lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:52:34 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] treewide: remove struct-pass-by-value
 from tracepoints arguments

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> OK, but instead of changing it to pass by reference, why not just pass
> the value. That is:
>
>  static void xen_set_pte_atomic(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>  {
> -       trace_xen_mmu_set_pte_atomic(ptep, pte);
> +       trace_xen_mmu_set_pte_atomic(ptep, native_pte_val(pte));
>         set_64bit((u64 *)ptep, native_pte_val(pte));
>  }

That looks simple and clean, and makes sense since the function itself
then uses that value anyway.

Certainly simpler than my monster define.

           Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ