netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] MIPS: mscc: Add switch to ocelot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:44:54 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Allan Nielsen <Allan.Nielsen@...rosemi.com>,
        razvan.stefanescu@....com, po.liu@....com,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] MIPS: mscc: Add switch to ocelot

On 03/23/2018 02:33 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:22:30PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 23/03/2018 at 14:17:48 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2018 01:11 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +			phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>>> +				reg = <0>;
>>>> +			};
>>>> +			phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
>>>> +				reg = <1>;
>>>> +			};
>>>> +			phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
>>>> +				reg = <2>;
>>>> +			};
>>>> +			phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
>>>> +				reg = <3>;
>>>> +			};
>>>
>>> These PHYs should be defined at the board DTS level.
>>
>> Those are internal PHYs, present on the SoC, I doubt anyone will have
>> anything different while using the same SoC.
> 
> With DSA, there is no need to list internal PHYs.
> 
> That is the trade off of having a standalone MDIO bus driver.  Maybe
> add a phandle to the internal MDIO bus? The switch driver could then
> follow the phandle, and direct connect the internal PHYs?

This is more or less what patch 7 does, right?
-- 
Florian