netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC V1 5/5] net: mdio: Add a driver for InES time stamping IP core.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:06:18 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC V1 5/5] net: mdio: Add a driver for InES
 time stamping IP core.

> > in the future some devices will be MDIO, or I2C, or SPI. Just call it
> > ptpdev. This ptpdev needs to be control bus agnostic. You need a
> > ptpdev core API exposing functions like ptpdev_hwtstamp,
> > ptpdev_rxtstamp, ptpdev_txtstamp, ptpdev_link_change, which take a
> > ptpdev.
> 
> Well, this name is not ideal, since time stamping devices in general
> can time stamp any frame, not just PTP frames.

Hi Richard

I don't really care about the name. I care about the semantics of the
API. How about ieee1588_rxtstamp, ieee1588_txtstamp, etc.

      Andrew