netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/9] bpf: introduce BPF_RAW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:34:35 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/9] bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:05:37 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> wrote:

> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h
> @@ -35,4 +35,10 @@ struct tracepoint {
>  	struct tracepoint_func __rcu *funcs;
>  };
>  
> +struct bpf_raw_event_map {
> +	struct tracepoint	*tp;
> +	void			*bpf_func;
> +	u32			num_args;
> +} __aligned(32);
> +

If you prefer v7, I'm fine with that. For cache issues, I can pull out
the funcs from the tracepoint structure like I posted.

Mathieu, your thoughts?

-- Steve