| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:42:53 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+6b495100f17ca8554ab9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, elena.reshetova@...el.com,
ishkamiel@...il.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, matthew@...systems.ca,
Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, xemul@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in skb_queue_tail
On 03.04.2018 14:25, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>> On 02.04.2018 12:20, syzbot wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> syzbot hit the following crash on net-next commit
>>> 06b19fe9a6df7aaa423cd8404ebe5ac9ec4b2960 (Sun Apr 1 03:37:33 2018 +0000)
>>> Merge branch 'chelsio-inline-tls'
>>> syzbot dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6b495100f17ca8554ab9
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
>>> Raw console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?id=6218830443446272
>>> Kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?id=3327544840960562528
>>> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+6b495100f17ca8554ab9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for details.
>>> If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.
>>>
>>>
>>> ======================================================
>>> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>>> 4.16.0-rc6+ #290 Not tainted
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> syz-executor7/20971 is trying to acquire lock:
>>> (&af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key){+.+.}, at: [<00000000271ef0d8>] skb_queue_tail+0x26/0x150 net/core/skbuff.c:2899
>>>
>>> but task is already holding lock:
>>> (&(&u->lock)->rlock/1){+.+.}, at: [<000000004e725e14>] unix_state_double_lock+0x7b/0xb0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1088
>>>
>>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>>
>>>
>>> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>>>
>>> -> #1 (&(&u->lock)->rlock/1){+.+.}:
>>> _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x28/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:354
>>> sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:82 [inline]
>>> sk_diag_fill.isra.4+0xa52/0xfe0 net/unix/diag.c:144
>>> sk_diag_dump net/unix/diag.c:178 [inline]
>>> unix_diag_dump+0x400/0x4f0 net/unix/diag.c:206
>>> netlink_dump+0x492/0xcf0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2221
>>> __netlink_dump_start+0x4ec/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2318
>>> netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:214 [inline]
>>> unix_diag_handler_dump+0x3e7/0x750 net/unix/diag.c:307
>>> __sock_diag_cmd net/core/sock_diag.c:230 [inline]
>>> sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x204/0x360 net/core/sock_diag.c:261
>>> netlink_rcv_skb+0x14b/0x380 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2443
>>> sock_diag_rcv+0x2a/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:272
>>> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1307 [inline]
>>> netlink_unicast+0x4c4/0x6b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1333
>>> netlink_sendmsg+0xa4a/0xe80 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1896
>>> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:629 [inline]
>>> sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:639
>>> sock_write_iter+0x31a/0x5d0 net/socket.c:908
>>> call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1782 [inline]
>>> new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:469 [inline]
>>> __vfs_write+0x684/0x970 fs/read_write.c:482
>>> vfs_write+0x189/0x510 fs/read_write.c:544
>>> SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:589 [inline]
>>> SyS_write+0xef/0x220 fs/read_write.c:581
>>> do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
>>>
>>> -> #0 (&af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key){+.+.}:
>>> lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
>>> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
>>> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
>>> skb_queue_tail+0x26/0x150 net/core/skbuff.c:2899
>>> unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xa30/0x1610 net/unix/af_unix.c:1807
>>> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:629 [inline]
>>> sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:639
>>> ___sys_sendmsg+0x320/0x8b0 net/socket.c:2047
>>> __sys_sendmmsg+0x1ee/0x620 net/socket.c:2137
>>> SYSC_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2168 [inline]
>>> SyS_sendmmsg+0x35/0x60 net/socket.c:2163
>>> do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
>>
>> sk_diag_dump_icons() dumps only sockets in TCP_LISTEN state.
>> TCP_LISTEN state may be assigned in only place in net/unix/af_unix.c:
>> it's unix_listen(). The function is applied to stream and seqpacket
>> socket types.
>>
>> It can't be stream because of the second stack, and seqpacket also can't,
>> as I don't think it's possible for gcc to inline unix_seqpacket_sendmsg()
>> in the way, we don't see it in the stack.
>>
>> So, this is looks like false positive result for me.
>>
>> Kirill
>
> Do you mean that these &(&u->lock)->rlock/1 referenced in 2 stacks are
> always different?
In these 2 particular stacks they have to be different.
But we may meet another stacks, where stream or seqpacket
functions are used instead of unix_dgram_sendmsg(), and
they may be true positive.
Kirill
> +Ingo for lockdep false positive
> Do we need some kind of annotation here?
>
>
>>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>>
>>> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>> ---- ----
>>> lock(&(&u->lock)->rlock/1);
>>> lock(&af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key);
>>> lock(&(&u->lock)->rlock/1);
>>> lock(&af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key);
>>>
>>> *** DEADLOCK ***
>>>
>>> 1 lock held by syz-executor7/20971:
>>> #0: (&(&u->lock)->rlock/1){+.+.}, at: [<000000004e725e14>] unix_state_double_lock+0x7b/0xb0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1088
>>>
>>> stack backtrace:
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 20971 Comm: syz-executor7 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc6+ #290
>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
>>> Call Trace:
>>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
>>> dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
>>> print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x2cd/0x2dc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223
>>> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline]
>>> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline]
>>> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
>>> __lock_acquire+0x30a8/0x3e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431
>>> lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
>>> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
>>> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
>>> skb_queue_tail+0x26/0x150 net/core/skbuff.c:2899
>>> unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xa30/0x1610 net/unix/af_unix.c:1807
>>> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:629 [inline]
>>> sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:639
>>> ___sys_sendmsg+0x320/0x8b0 net/socket.c:2047
>>> __sys_sendmmsg+0x1ee/0x620 net/socket.c:2137
>>> SYSC_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2168 [inline]
>>> SyS_sendmmsg+0x35/0x60 net/socket.c:2163
>>> do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
>>> RIP: 0033:0x455269
>>> RSP: 002b:00007f71ffad6c68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f71ffad76d4 RCX: 0000000000455269
>>> RDX: 04924924924924f4 RSI: 0000000020000200 RDI: 0000000000000016
>>> RBP: 000000000072bf58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: 00000000200000d4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000ffffffff
>>> R13: 00000000000004ca R14: 00000000006f9390 R15: 0000000000000001
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: sync thread started: state = BACKUP, mcast_ifn = bcsh0, syncid = 0, id = 0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>> IPVS: Unknown mcast interface: bcsh0
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
>>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
>>> Direct all questions to syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>>>
>>> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
>>> If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is merged
>>> into any tree, please reply to this email with:
>>> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
>>> To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
>>> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
>>> If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
>>> #syz invalid
>>> Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug report.
>>> Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/06c79d3f-3f28-7f1e-9431-66c18149c9e6%40virtuozzo.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists