lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:40:24 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm: renesas: Change platform dependency to ARCH_RENESAS On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS") > started the conversion from ARCH_SHMOBILE to ARCH_RENESAS for Renesas > ARM SoCs. This patch series completes the conversion, by: > 1. Updating dependencies for drivers that weren't converted yet, > 2. Removing the ARCH_SHMOBILE Kconfig symbols on ARM and ARM64. > > The first 6 patches can be applied independently by subsystem > maintainers. > The last two patches depend on the first 6 patches, and are thus marked > RFC. This all looks fine to me. Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists