lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:45:07 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm: renesas: Change platform dependency to ARCH_RENESAS

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:48 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:28:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The first 6 patches can be applied independently by subsystem
>> maintainers.
>> The last two patches depend on the first 6 patches, and are thus marked
>> RFC.
>
> Would it not make sense to try to apply everything en masse rather than
> delaying?  I'm happy to apply the subsystem stuff but if it gets things
> done quicker or more efficiently I'm also happy to have the lot merged
> as one series.

In theory, yes.

However, this touches multiple subsystems, and it's non-critical, so I don't
want to spent the energy to get this done in a synchronized way.
It's way easier to postpone the last (RFC) patches when everything else
has been applied by subsystem maintainers.

So please apply your part, thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ