| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:45:10 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> It's currently written as:
>
> if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1]
> tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
> ...
> }
>
> if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
> if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
> /* SFR-CACC processing */
> ...
> }
> }
>
> Which causes the SFR-CACC processing on ack reception to never process,
> as tchunk->tsn_gap_acked is always true by then. Block [1] was
> moved to that position by the commit marked below.
>
> This patch fixes it by doing SFR-CACC processing earlier, before
> tsn_gap_acked is set to true.
>
> Fixes: 31b02e154940 ("sctp: Failover transmitted list on transport delete")
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Even though this is a -stable candidate, please apply it to net-next
> to avoid conflicts with subsequent patches in my queue. Thanks.
>
> net/sctp/outqueue.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> index f211b3db6a3543073e113da121bb28518b0af491..dee7cbd5483149024f2f3195db2fe4d473b1a00a 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> @@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
> * the outstanding bytes for this chunk, so only
> * count bytes associated with a transport.
> */
> - if (transport) {
> + if (transport && !tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
> /* If this chunk is being used for RTT
> * measurement, calculate the RTT and update
> * the RTO using this value.
> @@ -1469,14 +1469,34 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
> * first instance of the packet or a later
> * instance).
> */
> - if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked &&
> - !sctp_chunk_retransmitted(tchunk) &&
> + if (!sctp_chunk_retransmitted(tchunk) &&
> tchunk->rtt_in_progress) {
> tchunk->rtt_in_progress = 0;
> rtt = jiffies - tchunk->sent_at;
> sctp_transport_update_rto(transport,
> rtt);
> }
> +
> + if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
> + /*
> + * SFR-CACC algorithm:
> + * 2) If the SACK contains gap acks
> + * and the flag CHANGEOVER_ACTIVE is
> + * set the receiver of the SACK MUST
> + * take the following action:
> + *
> + * B) For each TSN t being acked that
> + * has not been acked in any SACK so
> + * far, set cacc_saw_newack to 1 for
> + * the destination that the TSN was
> + * sent to.
> + */
> + if (sack->num_gap_ack_blocks &&
> + q->asoc->peer.primary_path->cacc.
> + changeover_active)
> + transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack
> + = 1;
> + }
> }
>
> /* If the chunk hasn't been marked as ACKED,
> @@ -1508,28 +1528,6 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
> restart_timer = 1;
> forward_progress = true;
>
> - if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
> - /*
> - * SFR-CACC algorithm:
> - * 2) If the SACK contains gap acks
> - * and the flag CHANGEOVER_ACTIVE is
> - * set the receiver of the SACK MUST
> - * take the following action:
> - *
> - * B) For each TSN t being acked that
> - * has not been acked in any SACK so
> - * far, set cacc_saw_newack to 1 for
> - * the destination that the TSN was
> - * sent to.
> - */
> - if (transport &&
> - sack->num_gap_ack_blocks &&
> - q->asoc->peer.primary_path->cacc.
> - changeover_active)
> - transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack
> - = 1;
> - }
> -
> list_add_tail(&tchunk->transmitted_list,
> &q->sacked);
> } else {
> --
> 2.14.3
>
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists