netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: bridge: Publish bridge accessor functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:28:29 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, petrm@...lanox.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: bridge: Publish bridge accessor
 functions

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:11:06 +0300
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com> wrote:

> +int br_vlan_pvid_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_pvid)
> +{
> +	struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
> +
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();
> +	if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
> +		vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev));
> +	else
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	*p_pvid = br_get_pvid(vg);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_pvid_rtnl);


Unless there is a RCU version, no need for _rtnl suffix.

Minor style issue, why not make error then go on and return -1 on error.



int br_vlan_pvid(const struct net_device *dev)
{
	const struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;

	ASSERT_RTNL();

	if (!netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
		return -1;

	vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev));
	return br_get_pvid(vg);
}