netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/10] bpf: remove never-hit branches in verifier adjust_scalar_min_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 28 Apr 2018 00:01:59 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/10] bpf: remove never-hit branches in verifier adjust_scalar_min_max_vals

In verifier function adjust_scalar_min_max_vals,
when src_known is false and the opcode is BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH,
early return will happen in the function. So remove
the branch in handling BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH when src_known is false.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 988400e..6e3f859 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2940,10 +2940,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			dst_reg->umin_value <<= umin_val;
 			dst_reg->umax_value <<= umax_val;
 		}
-		if (src_known)
-			dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
-		else
-			dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+		dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
 		/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
 		__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
 		break;
@@ -2971,11 +2968,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		 */
 		dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
 		dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
-		if (src_known)
-			dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off,
-						       umin_val);
-		else
-			dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+		dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
 		dst_reg->umin_value >>= umax_val;
 		dst_reg->umax_value >>= umin_val;
 		/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
-- 
2.9.5