netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 12:09:21 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c

between commit:

  a4e21ff8d9a3 ("bpf: minor fix to selftest test_stacktrace_build_id()")

from the bpf tree and commit:

  79b453501310 ("tools/bpf: add a test for bpf_get_stack with tracepoint prog")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index fac581f1c57f,aa336f0abebc..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@@ -1137,9 -1193,14 +1193,14 @@@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id(vo
  		  err, errno))
  		goto disable_pmu;
  
+ 	stack_amap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stack_amap");
+ 	if (CHECK(stack_amap_fd < 0, "bpf_find_map stack_amap",
+ 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+ 		goto disable_pmu;
+ 
  	assert(system("dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zero count=4 2> /dev/null")
  	       == 0);
 -	assert(system("./urandom_read if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zero count=4 2> /dev/null") == 0);
 +	assert(system("./urandom_read") == 0);
  	/* disable stack trace collection */
  	key = 0;
  	val = 1;
@@@ -1188,8 -1249,15 +1249,15 @@@
  		previous_key = key;
  	} while (bpf_map_get_next_key(stackmap_fd, &previous_key, &key) == 0);
  
- 	CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match",
- 	      "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n");
+ 	if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match",
 -		  "Didn't find expected build ID from the map"))
++		  "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n"))
+ 		goto disable_pmu;
+ 
+ 	stack_trace_len = PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH
+ 		* sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id);
+ 	err = compare_stack_ips(stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd, stack_trace_len);
+ 	CHECK(err, "compare_stack_ips stackmap vs. stack_amap",
+ 	      "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
  
  disable_pmu:
  	ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped