netdev - [PATCH net] sctp: init active key for the new asoc in dupcook_a and dupcook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  2 May 2018 13:37:44 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: init active key for the new asoc in dupcook_a and dupcook_b

When processing a duplicate cookie-echo chunk, for case 'A' and 'B',
after sctp_process_init for the new asoc, if auth is enabled for the
cookie-ack chunk, the active key should also be initialized.

Otherwise, the cookie-ack chunk made later can not be set with auth
shkey properly, and a crash can even be caused by this, as after
Commit 1b1e0bc99474 ("sctp: add refcnt support for sh_key"), sctp
needs to hold the shkey when making control chunks.

Fixes: 1b1e0bc99474 ("sctp: add refcnt support for sh_key")
Reported-by: Jianwen Ji <jiji@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index dd0594a..98acfed 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -1794,6 +1794,9 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a(
 			       GFP_ATOMIC))
 		goto nomem;
 
+	if (sctp_auth_asoc_init_active_key(new_asoc, GFP_ATOMIC))
+		goto nomem;
+
 	/* Make sure no new addresses are being added during the
 	 * restart.  Though this is a pretty complicated attack
 	 * since you'd have to get inside the cookie.
@@ -1906,6 +1909,9 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_dupcook_b(
 			       GFP_ATOMIC))
 		goto nomem;
 
+	if (sctp_auth_asoc_init_active_key(new_asoc, GFP_ATOMIC))
+		goto nomem;
+
 	/* Update the content of current association.  */
 	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_ASSOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc));
 	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE,
-- 
2.1.0