netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/14] net: sched: always take reference to action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 21:49:07 +0300
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
        kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] net: sched: always take reference to action


On Mon 14 May 2018 at 16:23, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:06PM CEST, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>>Without rtnl lock protection it is no longer safe to use pointer to tc
>>action without holding reference to it. (it can be destroyed concurrently)
>>
>>Remove unsafe action idr lookup function. Instead of it, implement safe tcf
>>idr check function that atomically looks up action in idr and increments
>>its reference and bind counters.
>>
>>Implement both action search and check using new safe function.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
>>---
>> net/sched/act_api.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
>>index 1331beb..9459cce 100644
>>--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
>>+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
>>@@ -284,44 +284,38 @@ int tcf_generic_walker(struct tc_action_net *tn, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_generic_walker);
>> 
>>-static struct tc_action *tcf_idr_lookup(u32 index, struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo)
>>+bool __tcf_idr_check(struct tc_action_net *tn, u32 index, struct tc_action **a,
>>+		     int bind)
>> {
>>-	struct tc_action *p = NULL;
>>+	struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo = tn->idrinfo;
>>+	struct tc_action *p;
>> 
>> 	spin_lock_bh(&idrinfo->lock);
>
> Why "_bh" variant is necessary here?

It is not my code.

>
>> 	p = idr_find(&idrinfo->action_idr, index);
>>+	if (p) {
>>+		refcount_inc(&p->tcfa_refcnt);
>>+		if (bind)
>>+			atomic_inc(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
>>+	}
>> 	spin_unlock_bh(&idrinfo->lock);
>
> [...]