lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 23:46:28 +0300
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, pablo@...filter.org,
        kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Modify action API for implementing lockless actions


On Mon 14 May 2018 at 18:03, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 14/05/18 10:27 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Currently, all netlink protocol handlers for updating rules, actions and
>> qdiscs are protected with single global rtnl lock which removes any
>> possibility for parallelism. This patch set is a first step to remove
>> rtnl lock dependency from TC rules update path. It updates act API to
>> use atomic operations, rcu and spinlocks for fine-grained locking. It
>> also extend API with functions that are needed to update existing
>> actions for parallel execution.
>> 
>> Outline of changes:
>> - Change tc action to use atomic reference and bind counters, rcu
>>    mechanism for cookie update.
>> - Extend action ops API with 'delete' function and 'unlocked' flag.
>> - Change action API to work with actions in lockless manner based on
>>    primitives implemented in previous patches.
>> - Extend action API with new functions necessary to implement unlocked
>>    actions.
>
> Please run all the tdc tests with these changes. This area has almost
> good test coverage at this point. If you need help just ping me.
>
> cheers,
> jamal


Hello Jamal,

I'm trying to run tdc, but keep getting following error even on clean
branch without my patches:

Test d190: Add police action with maximum index

-----> teardown stage *** Could not execute: "$TC actions flush action mirred"

-----> teardown stage *** Error message: "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
We have an error flushing
"

-----> teardown stage *** Aborting test run.


<_io.BufferedReader name=3> *** stdout ***


<_io.BufferedReader name=5> *** stderr ***
"-----> teardown stage" did not complete successfully
Exception <class '__main__.PluginMgrTestFail'> ('teardown', 'RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument\nWe have an error talking to the kernel\nCommand "action" is unknown, try "tc actions help".\n', '"-----> teardown stage" did not complete suc
cessfully') (caught in test_runner, running test 54 d190 Add police action with maximum index stage teardown)
---------------
traceback
  File "./tdc.py", line 293, in test_runner
    tap += run_one_test(pm, args, index, tidx)
  File "./tdc.py", line 229, in run_one_test
    prepare_env(args, pm, 'teardown', '-----> teardown stage', tidx['teardown'], procout)
  File "./tdc.py", line 177, in prepare_env
    '"{}" did not complete successfully'.format(prefix))
---------------
accumulated output for this test:
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
We have an error talking to the kernel
Command "action" is unknown, try "tc actions help".

---------------


I've updated both iproute2 and kernel to latest master and net-next
respectively, but error persists. Am I missing something? Maybe I should
you some specific "blessed" version of TC?

Thanks,
Vlad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ