netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] phy: add 2.5G SGMII mode to the phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 10:37:03 +0200
From:   Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kishon@...com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        jason@...edaemon.net, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
        ymarkman@...vell.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] phy: add 2.5G SGMII mode to the
 phy_mode enum

Hi Russell,

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > This patch adds one more generic PHY mode to the phy_mode enum, to allow
> > configuring generic PHYs to the 2.5G SGMII mode by using the set_mode
> > callback.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
> > Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> 
> Would it be possible to get the 2.5G SGMII comphy support merged
> ahead of the rest of this series please - I don't think there's been
> any objections to it, and having it in mainline would then mean I can
> drop the Marvell Comphy code from my tree and transition to the bootlin
> Comphy code instead.
> 
> Of course, the perfect solution would be to get the whole series merged,
> but I'm just thinking about the situation where we're still discussing
> points when the next merge window opens.

That would be great, and there are no dependency issue if patches 6 and
7 are taken ahead.

Kishon: since there are no objection to these two phy patches, could you
take them?

Thanks!
Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com