lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 14:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com,
        Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] net: stmmac: Clean-up and tune-up

From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:50:42 +0100

> David raised some rightfull constrains about the use of indirect callbacks in
> the code. I did iperf tests with and without patches 3-12 and the performance
> remained equal. I guess for 1Gb/s and because my setup has a powerfull
> processor these patches don't affect the performance.

Does your cpu need Spectre v1 and v2 workarounds which cause indirect calls to
be extremely expensive?

That's the case I'm worried about.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ