netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: bridge: Extract boilerplate around switchdev_port_obj

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 May 2018 12:10:57 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        razvan.stefanescu@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: bridge: Extract boilerplate around switchdev_port_obj_*()

Hi Petr,

Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com> writes:

> -static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
> -			  u16 vid, u16 flags)
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16 flags)
>  {
>  	struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
>  		.obj.orig_dev = dev,
> @@ -89,12 +88,29 @@ static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
>  		.vid_begin = vid,
>  		.vid_end = vid,
>  	};
> -	int err;
>  
> +	return switchdev_port_obj_add(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
> +
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> +{
> +	struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> +		.obj.orig_dev = dev,
> +		.obj.id = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
> +		.vid_begin = vid,
> +		.vid_end = vid,
> +	};
> +
> +	return switchdev_port_obj_del(dev, &v.obj);
> +}

Shouldn't they be br_switchdev_port_vlan_add (or similar) implemented in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c instead, since they are VLAN specific?

Other than that, the change looks good!

Thanks,

        Vivien