netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf v3 3/5] selftests/bpf: test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 15:29:43 -0400
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 3/5] selftests/bpf: test_sockmap, fix test timeout

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 02:56:09PM +0900, Prashant Bhole wrote:
> In order to reduce runtime of tests, recently timout for select() call
> was reduced from 1sec to 10usec. This was causing many tests failures.
> It was caught with failure handling commits in this series.
> 
> Restoring the timeout from 10usec to 1sec
> 
> Fixes: a18fda1a62c3 ("bpf: reduce runtime of test_sockmap tests")
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> index 64f9e25c451f..9d01f5c2abe2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> @@ -345,8 +345,8 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
>  		if (err < 0)
>  			perror("recv start time: ");
>  		while (s->bytes_recvd < total_bytes) {
> -			timeout.tv_sec = 0;
> -			timeout.tv_usec = 10;
> +			timeout.tv_sec = 1;
> +			timeout.tv_usec = 0;

I've applied the set, but had to revert it, since it takes too long.

real	1m40.124s
user	0m0.375s
sys	0m14.521s

Myself and Daniel run the test semi-manually when we apply patches.
Adding 2 extra minutes of wait time is unnecessary.
Especially since most of it is idle time.
Please find a way to fix tests differently.
btw I don't see any failures today. Not sure what is being fixed
by incresing a timeout.

Also please mention [PATCH bpf-next] in the subject when you respin.
Thanks!