netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] route: add support for directed broadcast forwarding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:15:19 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] route: add support for directed broadcast forwarding

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> wrote:
> Hi Xin,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:45:08AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>> This patch implements the feature described in rfc1812#section-5.3.5.2
>> and rfc2644. It allows the router to forward directed broadcast when
>> sysctl mc_forwarding is enabled.
>
> You mean bc_forwarding?
yes, typo, bc_forwarding.

>
>>
>> Note that this feature could be done by iptables -j TEE, but it would
>> cause some problems:
>>   - target TEE's gateway param has to be set with a specific address,
>>     and it's not flexible especially when the route wants forward all
>>     directed broadcasts.
>>   - this duplicates the directed broadcasts so this may cause side
>>     effects to applications.
>>
>> Besides, to keep consistent with other os router like BSD, it's also
>> necessary to implement it in the route rx path.
>
> Regarding the test you posted later in the thread, did you consider
> adding it as part of tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/ ? I believe
> you can write the test using VRFs instead of name spaces.
didn't know that, but sounds good, will have a try. :)
Thanks.

>
> Thanks