netdev - Re: [bpf-next PATCH 1/2] samples/bpf: extend xdp_rxq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:23:12 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH 1/2] samples/bpf: extend xdp_rxq_info to read
 packet payload

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:53:15 -0700
Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com> wrote:

> > +static char* options2str(enum cfg_options_flags flag)
> > +{
> > +       if (flag == NO_TOUCH)
> > +               return "no_touch";
> > +       if (flag & READ_MEM)
> > +               return "read";
> > +       fprintf(stderr, "ERR: Unknown config option flags");
> > +       exit(EXIT_FAIL);
> > +}
> > +  
> 
> enum cfg_options_flags is used as a bitmap in other parts of the sample.
> So this function is a little weird (with more flags added).

Sure, and do I handle this correctly in the next patch.

I'm uncertain what you want me to change?
Do you want me to drop the enum, and use #define instead?

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer