netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Add support for CBS QDISC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:36:15 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, kbuild-all@...org,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com,
        Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Add support for CBS QDISC

Hi Jose,

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:32 PM Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> wrote:
> ++ SH Maintainers
> ++ SH ML
>
> Hi SH Maintainers,
>
> On 27-06-2018 15:15, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Jose,
> >
> > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
> >
> > url:    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_0day-2Dci_linux_commits_Jose-2DAbreu_net-2Dstmmac-2DAdd-2Dsupport-2Dfor-2DCBS-2DQDISC_20180627-2D214704&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=WHDsc6kcWAl4i96Vm5hJ_19IJiuxx_p_Rzo2g-uHDKw&m=YIae3rrFzqYg_5b4eVIAXuyvT_EV0vKACS25rJugux8&s=qW5_vbinGt0OnyDfQ2wtKdb2ZGzCcLwq6Fmlaki61xw&e=
> > config: sh-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: sh4-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
> > reproduce:
> >         wget https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__raw.githubusercontent.com_intel_lkp-2Dtests_master_sbin_make.cross&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=WHDsc6kcWAl4i96Vm5hJ_19IJiuxx_p_Rzo2g-uHDKw&m=YIae3rrFzqYg_5b4eVIAXuyvT_EV0vKACS25rJugux8&s=4nNar4fgVZq0LjrPKIZP30nxVUY4yeu5QeyKbmlsu8A&e= -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=sh
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    In file included from ./arch/sh/include/generated/asm/div64.h:1:0,
> >                     from include/linux/kernel.h:174,
> >                     from include/linux/list.h:9,
> >                     from include/linux/timer.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/workqueue.h:9,
> >                     from include/net/pkt_cls.h:6,
> >                     from drivers/net//ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c:7:
> >    drivers/net//ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c: In function 'tc_setup_cbs':
> >    include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
> >      (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
> >                                ^
> >>> drivers/net//ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c:325:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> >      do_div(value, speed_div);
> >      ^~~~~~
> >    include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
> >      (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
>
> I'm not seeing the reason for this warning as I'm using a 64 bit
> var. I guess the warning is appearing only because its signed
> [see source bellow]. Is this not supported?

No, the first parameter of do_div() must be u64, hence the check to
enforce that.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds