netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: preserve sock reference when scrubbing the skb.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpW-Ggs5iHjshWiSbNArANsBK8JVY-Qt0Lw+m=sk4onzpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:41:16 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: preserve sock reference when
 scrubbing the skb.

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:20 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:39:01 -0700
>
> > Let me rephrase why I don't like this patchset:
>
> Cong, I don't think you are seeing the situation clearly and
> I am certainly going to apply this patch series even in the
> face of your objections.
>
> Suggesting that solving the lack of back pressure on a UDP
> socket caused by this problem by using cgroups or cpu
> usage controllers is just complete and utter madness.

Pretty sure you didn't even read the rest of my reply,
I can't help you if you just stop at where you quoted.