lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:37:36 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments cache worker



On 07/06/2018 06:56 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> With:
> 
> schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), #... )
> 
> We can be sure to run exclusively on the cpu handling the RX queue even with the worker.
> 

Make sure to test your patch with 16 RX queues (16 cpus) feeding the defrag unit.

In this (common) mode, then having one cpu trying to purge frags wont be enough.

Really the GC can not cope with DDOS, we tried that in the past (IPv4 route cache)
and failed miserably.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ