netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: NFT_SOCKET don't use NF_SOCKET_IPV6 without NF_TABLES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:24:59 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Máté Eckl <ecklm94@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: NFT_SOCKET don't use NF_SOCKET_IPV6 without
 NF_TABLES_IPV6

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:15:36PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
> This patch only solves the nf_socket and nft_socket modules problem so I can
> only submit a v2 for 'netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select dependencies' but
> you already applied it so it would meen a force push. Should I do this?
> 
> I think Arnd's patch solves these problems in case we don't want to force-push
> or rebase.

You are refering to these two patches, right?

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941374/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941696/

> > I think it's better if we toss your original patch in the tree and
> > rebase, ie. take the new one that fixes all issues that Arnd is
> > reporting. It would be good if we can sort out this before I send the
> > next pull request for net-next stuff.
> > 
> > I was afraid of fallout like this when I saw your original patch,
> > kbuild is always tricky.
> 
> This patch is not related to the nft_tproxy module (it seems that you refer to
> that) as Arnd didn't have that in the tree when doing this. I'll send a v4 fot
> the tproxy module, but that cannot be related to this one as it is not in tree
> yet.

No, I'm refering to 35bf1ccecaaa ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6
select dependencies"), that is causing the issues.

Thanks.