lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:00:42 +0200
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     liuhangbin@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sbrivio@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: reset fnhe_mtu_locked after cache route flushed

2018-05-10, 15:43:11 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> Date: Wed,  9 May 2018 18:06:44 +0800
> 
> > After route cache is flushed via ipv4_sysctl_rtcache_flush(), we forget
> > to reset fnhe_mtu_locked in rt_bind_exception(). When pmtu is updated
> > in __ip_rt_update_pmtu(), it will return directly since the pmtu is
> > still locked. e.g.
> > 
> > + ip netns exec client ping 10.10.1.1 -c 1 -s 1400 -M do
> > PING 10.10.1.1 (10.10.1.1) 1400(1428) bytes of data.
> > From 10.10.0.254 icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 0)
> > 
> > --- 10.10.1.1 ping statistics ---
> > 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
> > 
> > + ip netns exec client ip route get 10.10.1.1
> > 10.10.1.1 via 10.10.0.254 dev veth0_c src 10.10.0.1 uid 0
> >     cache expires 599sec mtu lock 552
> > + ip netns exec client ip route flush cache
> > + ip netns exec client ip route get 10.10.1.1
> > 10.10.1.1 via 10.10.0.254 dev veth0_c src 10.10.0.1 uid 0
> >     cache
> > + ip netns exec client ping 10.10.1.1 -c 1 -s 1400 -M do
> > PING 10.10.1.1 (10.10.1.1) 1400(1428) bytes of data.
> > ping: local error: Message too long, mtu=576
> > 
> > --- 10.10.1.1 ping statistics ---
> > 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
> > 
> > + ip netns exec client ip route get 10.10.1.1
> > 10.10.1.1 via 10.10.0.254 dev veth0_c src 10.10.0.1 uid 0
> >     cache
> > 
> > Fixes: d52e5a7e7ca49 ("ipv4: lock mtu in fnhe when received PMTU < net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu")
> > Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> 
> Applied.

meh, I know it's way too late, but I just noticed this patch lost most
of its commit message, and all of its tags, when it went into git :(
Patchwork actually thinks the format is ok (it counts one Fixes and
one Reviewed-by), but git cut all that out.

Would there be a way to detect this when you apply patches? "there's
no tag above the first '^---', but there are some tags below it",
something like that?

commit 0e8411e426e277f55bd21e287ec89fab6f8eacae
Author: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Date:   Wed May 9 18:06:44 2018 +0800

    ipv4: reset fnhe_mtu_locked after cache route flushed
    
    After route cache is flushed via ipv4_sysctl_rtcache_flush(), we forget
    to reset fnhe_mtu_locked in rt_bind_exception(). When pmtu is updated
    in __ip_rt_update_pmtu(), it will return directly since the pmtu is
    still locked. e.g.
    
    + ip netns exec client ping 10.10.1.1 -c 1 -s 1400 -M do
    PING 10.10.1.1 (10.10.1.1) 1400(1428) bytes of data.
    >From 10.10.0.254 icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 0)
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

-- 
Sabrina

Powered by blists - more mailing lists