lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:12:59 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when
 enable busyloop



On 2018年07月11日 11:49, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年07月04日 12:31, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
>>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>>>
>>> This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance.
>>> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time.
>>> handle_rx do that in the same way.
>>>
>>> For more performance report, see patch 4.
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> fix some issues
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>> fix some issues
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> This patches are splited from previous big patch:
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/934673/
>>>
>>> Tonghao Zhang (4):
>>>     vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>>>     net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>>>     net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>>>     net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>>>
>>>    drivers/vhost/net.c   | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>    drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 ++++-------
>>>    2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Hi, any progress on the new version?
>>
>> I plan to send a new series of packed virtqueue support of vhost. If you
>> plan to send it soon, I can wait. Otherwise, I will send my series.
> I rebase the codes. and find there is no improvement anymore, the
> patches of  makita  may solve the problem. jason you may send your
> patches, and I will do some research on busypoll.

I see. Maybe you can try some bi-directional traffic.

Btw, lots of optimizations could be done for busy polling. E.g 
integrating with host NAPI busy polling or a 100% busy polling 
vhost_net. You're welcome to work or propose new ideas.

Thanks

>
>> Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ