netdev - Re: [Cake] [PATCH iproute2-next v10] Add support for CAKE qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:56:00 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH iproute2-next v10] Add support for CAKE qdisc

Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:39:26 +0200
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk> wrote:
>
>> +#define PRINT_TSTAT(name, attr, fmts, val)	do {		\
>> +			if (GET_TSTAT(0, attr)) {		\
>> +				fprintf(f, name);		\
>> +				for (i = 0; i < num_tins; i++)	\
>> +					fprintf(f, " %12" fmts,	val);	\
>> +				fprintf(f, "\n");			\
>> +			}						\
>> +		} while (0)
>
> Couldn't this be a function?

Guess so? But keeping it as a macro keeps it closer to where it is
defined, and keeps the macro definitions together. IMO this is more
readable than splitting things up...

-Toke