netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:54:13 +0300
From:   Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
CC:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

Hi,
I've tested this patch and seems problematic at this moment.
maybe this is because of the bug that Steve mentioned in the NVMe 
mailing list. Sagi mentioned that we should fix it in the NVMe/RDMA 
initiator and I'll run his suggestion as well.
BTW, when I run the blk_mq_map_queues it works for every irq affinity.

On 7/16/2018 1:30 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:23:24PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> Leon, I'd like to see a tested-by tag for this (at least
>> until I get some time to test it).
> 
> Of course.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>>
>> The patch itself looks fine to me.


-Max.